Résultats de la recherche (4 résultats)
- > Special issue : Geomorphic systems (supprimer)
Affinez votre recherche
Par Collection Par Auteur- PHILLIPS, J. D., (Editeur scientifique) (4)
- RENWICK, W. H., (Editeur scientifique) (4)
- PHILLIPS, J. D. (1)
- KENNEDY, B. A. (1)
- MAYER, L. (1)
- SCHEIDEGGER, A. E. (1)
- TROFIMOV, A. M. (1)
- 1992 (4)
- Catastrophe ; Concept ; Earth surface processes ; Geomorphology ; Methodology (1)
- Catastrophe ; Concept ; Géomorphodynamique ; Géomorphologie ; Méthodologie (1)
- Concept ; Cycle d'érosion ; Erosion ; Géomorphologie ; Modèle ; Système (1)
- Concept ; Erosion ; Erosion cycle ; Geomorphology ; Model ; System (1)
- Concept ; Forecast;Prediction ; Geographical information system ; Geomorphology ; Geosystem ; Methodology ; Model ; Statistics (1)
- Concept ; Geomorphology ; Methodology ; Statistics ; System ; Tectonics (1)
- Concept ; Géomorphologie ; Géosystème ; Modèle ; Méthodologie ; Prévision ; Statistique ; Système d'information géographique (1)
- Concept ; Géomorphologie ; Méthodologie ; Statistique ; Système ; Tectonique (1)
- Special issue : Geomorphic systems (4)
- Hutton to Horton : views of sequence, progression and equilibrium in geomorphology (1)
- Limitations of the system approach in geomorphology (1)
- Some comments on equilibrium concepts and geomorphic systems (1)
- Theoretical and methodological promises of geomorphological forecasting (1)
- Some comments on equilibrium concepts and geomorphic systems
- The aim of the present paper is to review some of the basic principles of system dynamics and of landscape evolution, and then to compare he former with the latter. It will be seen that not all geomorphic features can be treated by system theory
- , but that some definitely have to be dealt with by other methods.
- The purpose of this paper is to formally outline some fundamental theoretical and methodological promises of geomorphological forecasting. It is shown that there is a conceptual link between field studies of spatial structures and landscape
- It is the aim of the present paper to examine some of the views of process, time and change held by 6 major figures who are, at least ostensibly, members of the « dynamic » tradition (Hutton, Lyell, Darwin, Dana, Gilbert and Horton). It is suggested