Mots-clés
Biais électoral ; Campagne électorale ; Collège électoral ; Election ; Etats-Unis ; Géographie politique ; Géographie électorale ; Parti politiqueElection ; Electoral campaign ; Electoral geography ; Political geography ; Political party ; United States of AmericaElección ; Estados Unidos ; Geografía electoral ; Geografía política ; Partido político“The electors shall meet in their respective states” : bias and the US Presidential Electoral College, 1960–2012
Auteur(s) et Affiliation(s)
PATTIE, C.
Dept. of Geography, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, Royaume-Uni
JOHNSTON, R.
Dept. of Geography, Univ., Sheffield, Royaume-Uni
Description :
This article examines bias and the US Presidential Electoral College, 1960–2012. First, it explains that in common with other plurality-based electoral systems, the College tends to exaggerate the apparent mandate received by the winner of the popular vote but, on occasion, can deliver victory to the second-placed candidate. Second, it analyses the evidence for such a bias and demonstrates that neither major party is a consistent beneficiary; the prime source of bias is to be found in the relative effectiveness of parties' own vote-winning strategies.
Type de document :
Article de périodique
Source :
Political geography, issn : 0962-6298, 2014, vol. 40, p. 35-45, nombre de pages : 11
Date :
2014
Editeur :
Pays édition : Royaume-Uni, Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann
Langue :
Anglais
Anglais
Droits :
Tous droits réservés © Prodig - Bibliographie Géographique Internationale (BGI)
Tous droits réservés © Prodig - Bibliographie Géographique Internationale (BGI)