inscription
Portail d'information géographique

Analyzing bias in prominent climatic data sets

Auteur(s) et Affiliation(s)

SVOMA, B.M.
Arizona State University, Tempe, Etats-Unis
CERVENY, R.
Arizona State University, Tempe, Etats-Unis


Description :
The majority of documented climatic data set biases can be divided into two categories : physical biases and calendar biases. Previous homogenization efforts for prominent temperature and precipitation data sets are detailed in this review. Numerous physical biases are accounted for in these homogenization efforts and a debate exists in the literature regarding the effectiveness of these bias adjustment methods, leading some investigators to question the suitability of these adjusted data sets for the identification of large-scale climate change signals. Calendar biases are not addressed in previous homogenization efforts. After a brief analysis, a calendar bias known to exist in homogenized data sets (the leap year bias) is identified in the CRUTEM3v, an important global monthly near-surface air temperature data set.


Type de document :
Article de périodique

Source :
Progress in physical geography, issn : 0309-1333, 2012, vol. 36, n°. 3, p. 333-347, nombre de pages : 15, Références bibliographiques : 2 p.

Date :
2012

Editeur :
Pays édition : Royaume-Uni, London, Sage Publications

Langue :
Anglais
Droits :
Tous droits réservés © Prodig - Bibliographie Géographique Internationale (BGI)